πŸͺΏ Wild Goose + Content Recipe β€” Interactive Demo

Right repo. Right code. Wrong thing.

The same gate that tastes your pull requests now tastes your content. Wild Goose catches work the project never asked for β€” in code and in writing β€” and the Content Recipe makes sure what ships is sourced and on-brand.

Waiting
incoming pull request code
prkitchen check Code
$ awaiting pull request...
πŸͺΏ One gate Β· two domains

Wild Goose covers code and content

Wild Goose never reads syntax. It reads intent β€” does this change serve the purpose you wrote down? That question works the same whether the change is a feature or a blog post. The Content Recipe then checks the craft.

Wild Goose (intent)Content Recipe (craft)
Code PROff-mission feature? β†’ back to the kitchenβ€”
Content PROff-topic for this project? β†’ backMissing sources / banned phrase? β†’ back
πŸͺΏ

Wild Goose Guard

You state the project's purpose once. Any change that drifts from it β€” an unrequested feature, scope creep, an off-topic post β€” gets flagged. Confidence-gated, so it stays quiet when it isn't sure.

πŸ“

Required Elements & House Rules

Content must include its parts β€” summary, sources, CTA β€” and follow your house rules: banned phrases out, required disclaimers in. Each company sets its own.

πŸ”Ž

Sources Required

If a piece makes a claim β€” a stat, "studies show" β€” it has to cite a source. Next course: an AI accuracy check that reads the claim against the source it cites.

Reserve Your Table 🍽️ Why PRKitchen β†’